Mining is promoted by the Yukon government as a cornerstone of territorial economic development, particularly in the context of growing demand for critical minerals. Mine proponents and policymakers claim that mining delivers well-paid jobs, stable revenues, and long-term prosperity for the territory, while regulatory processes are cited as a barrier to timely project development. This working paper tests those claims by auditing the economic performance of major Yukon mines approved through the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB) process since 2005.
We set out to answer the following questions:
• To what extent do regulatory processes play a role in delaying mine opening?
• How do the economic benefits of mining projects compare to the projections made during the mines’ environmental assessments?
The analysis focuses on six major mines: Minto, Wolverine, Keno Hill, Eagle Gold, Mactung, and Carmack Copper. We compare projected timelines and economic benefits presented during the YESAB process with actual outcomes.
Findings
- This report shows that regulation was rarely responsible for mine delays and closures.
- Economic performance consistently fell short of projections. Average annual production across operational mines was 57 percent lower than forecast.
- Employment projections were similarly unreliable. Where data were available, average employment was 31 percent lower than projected at operational mines, which undermine claims that mining delivers stable, local employment benefits.
Recommendations
- Strengthen economic information requirements in YESAB assessments.
- Embed economic benefit reporting and public transparency in YG mine regulations and permitting.
- Ensure government oversight and accountability mechanisms.
Read the full report by clicking on the button below:
